ILWWCM question follow-up from the comments
Tags :ILWWCM
Declan
Lynch posted a good question
in response to my posting yesterday. He asked the following:
I'm currently doing a lot of work on the Domino version
of LWWCM. The installation is a lot easier and is the better option if
you already have a Domino infrastructure to take advantage of. In
terms of failover and load balancing how does the Java edition fair out
?
That is a fair question to ask actually and the answer can be the same
depending on how you are storing the back end content. Keeping in
mind that the actual server itself still relies on Websphere, you must
cluster there also to have the same availability that you would expect
from Domino. We won't even consider network issues yet.
I think that this part of the product has not been explored or addressed
fully yet by IBM/Lotus. They do get into caching, but not nearly
enough for me to be comfortable with configurations and expectations of
caching yet.
So to answer the question in simple terms before my brain wanders, I think
they fair exactly the same at this point. This reminds me of Sametime
before Community Clusters were fully understood but yet people were looking
to this to scale.
blog comments powered by Disqus
On Tuesday, November 9th, 2004 by Chris Miller
